
Metastatic
Squamous Cell Carcinoma:
In addition to a 65-fold higher risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma
(SCC), SCC that develop in adult transplant recipients are at higher risk
for metastasis, 5-7%, compared to the general population, ~2% (1). ~13%
of SCC that occur in pediatric patients (those <18 y/o) metastasize.
SCC that occur on the lip of pediatric patients are at particularly high
risk (2).
SCC metastasis is generally associated with a poor prognosis with a 3-year
disease-free survival rate in adult patients of 56%(3). Relapse of SCC
is common, with the cumulative relapse rate ~29% within 1-year of treatment.
Read about:

Few large studies of metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)
are available. One of the largest was performed by Martinez et al 2003
who followed 68 pts with 73 distinct metastatic skin cancers(3). In this
study, the mean onset of metastatic SCC occurred 10.7-years following
transplantation. The mean time with which metastatic SCC was detected
after diagnosis of the primary SCC lesion was 1.4-years.
The location where metastatic SCC was detected varied. 36% of patients
had in-transit metastasis, metastasic foci located between the primary
tumor and the closest lymph node region. These usually represent SCC spread
along lymphatic vessels and/or nerves. 78% had lymph node metastasis occurring
in draining nodal basins, and 35% had distant systemic/visceral metastasis.
The most common sites for distant disease were lung and bone.
The median size of the primary tumor was 120 mm2 and the median depth
was 3.2 mm.
All metastatic SCC patients had prior history of several non melanoma
skin cancers (BCC or SCC). 39 patients had a median of 11 prior NMSC over
a mean of 10.4-years.
The predominant immunosuppressive regimen in patients that developed metastatic
squamous cell carcinoma was CAP (cyclosporine, azathioprine, prednisolone)
53% versus AP (azathioprine, prednisolone) 22% and CP 15% (cyclosporine,
prednisolone). This data supports other studies which suggest that cyclosporine
and azathioprine may have small, but significant effects in directly inducing
squamous cell carcinoma in transplant patients.(4, 5)

In-transit metastases are cutaneous metastatic foci located between tumor
and the closet lymph node region. Analogous to in-transit metastasis found
in melanoma, these represent metastatic spread along lymphatic vessels
and/or nerves and their presence is a poor prognostic indicator. Overall,
in-transit metastasis occur most frequently from SCC risk stratified as
"high risk" lesions (see
risk stratification of SCC) although all SCC that occur in immunosuppressed
patients have the potential for distant spread.
Characteristics of primary tumors that develop into metastatic SCC include
diameters >120mm2, invasion to a depth >3.2mm, and invasion of underlying
SQ fat, muscle or bone(1, 6). A good review of in-transit metastasis can
be found in Carucci et al., Dermatologic Surgery, 30; 651 (2004).
Clinically, in-transit metastasis are nondescript, subtle, waxy, gray-white
to flesh colored SQ papules 2-6mm in diameter that are not contiguous
with the primary lesion(1).
Local control of in-transit metastasis should be achieved with
Mohs surgical
technique or some other surgical method where surgical margins are rigorously
evaluated for residual tumor, perineural extension or intravascular invasion.
(e.g. excision with intraoperative frozen section control or excision
with postoperative margin assessment). Post operative radiation should
be strongly considered. The radiation field often involves the primary
tumor site, the in-transit metastatic site, and the draining lymph node
basin.
Other treatments or diagnostic procedures that can be considered include:
- Systemic retinoids
- Sentinal lymph node biopsy
- Reduction/alteration in immunosuppressive regimen
90% of metastatic SCC occur within 3-years of diagnosis of the primary
tumor. The majority of these metastatic lesions come from primary tumors
stratified in the "high-risk" category (see risk
stratification of SCC). Current guidelines
from the International Transplant Skin Cancer Consortium (ITSCC) suggest
that patients with high risk SCC should be examined every 2-3 months.
Clinical
exams should include a full body skin examination, palpation of previous
excision sites and examination of the skin between primary tumor sites
and draining lymph nodes for in-transit metastasis. Regional lymph nodes
should be palpated for lymphadenopathy and any suspicious lymph node enlargement
should be evaluated by biopsy, imaging, or both.
The 1-year disease-specific survival for in-transit or regional nodal
metastasis is 89%.
Some studies have found that development of in-transit metastasis from
primary cutaneous SCC in transplant patients is associated with a 22%
2-year mortality rate (1, 3).

Regional nodal metastasis is the most common site for metastatic disease
to be detected. in transplant patients(3). If suspicious lymph nodes are
found on clinical exam, the most common way to confirm nodal spread is
by fine needle aspiration (FNA) or less commonly by excisional lymph node
biopsy.
Imaging techniques using CT or CT/PET are useful for staging and detecting
distant disease. MRI provides superior resolution of soft tissue tumors,
particularly in the head and neck region and should be considered for
metastases that occur in these regions.
The neck lymph nodes are most commonly involved (41%) followed by the
axiallary lymph nodes (28%), parotid lymph nodes (22%) and inguinal lymph
nodes (3%).
Characteristics of primary tumors that develop into metastatic SCC include
diameters >120mm2, invasion to a depth >3.2mm, and invasion of underlying
SQ fat, muscle or bone(1, 6)
Regional lymph node metastasis is most commonly treated by lymph node
dissection followed by post-operative radiation. A complete staging work
up should completed prior to any surgery.
Adjunctive treatments include:
- Oral retinoids
- Reduction/alteration in immunosuppressive regimen
The 1-year disease-specific survival for in-transit or regional nodal
metastasis is 89%.

Distant metastasis, including distant nodal involvement or metastasis
to systemic organs, is the most feared complication of cutaneous squamous
cell carcinoma. 35% of transplant patients who develop metastasis will
have distant metastasis. The most common sites are the lung (21%), bone
(18%), central nervous system (6%) and liver (4%). Distant metastasis
is generally associated with a poor prognosis with a 3-year disease-free
survival rate in adult transplant patients of 56%(3).
Characteristics of primary tumors that develop into metastatic SCC include
diameters >120mm2, invasion to a depth >3.2mm, and invasion of underlying
SQ fat, muscle or bone(1, 6)
- Surgery(7)
- Radiation(8)
- Chemotherapy(9)
- Chemoradiotherapy(9)
- Reduction of immunosuppression(10)
- Combination of the above
Of these modalities, surgical extirpation of SCC is the most commonly
utilized primary therapeutic modality (63% of treatments (3)). Surgery
with adjunctive radiation is the next most common treatment (8% of treatments
(3)).
Chemotherapy is rarely utilized, however, the current role and recent
advances in chemotherapy for advanced cutaneous SCC as well as for advanced
and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) was recently
reviewed by Martinez et al., Dermatologic Surgery, 30; 679 (2004) . These
authors concluded that chemotherapy alone is likely to be ineffective
as a curative treatment but concurrent use of chemotherapy and radiation
(chemotherapy) may play a role in organ preservation as an alternative
to surgery in the presence of unresectable disease or for patients too
ill to undergo general anesthesia or major surgery. Additionally, chemotherapy
may play a distinct role in palliation of patients with advanced disease.
Although palliative chemotherapy has no proven increase in overall survival,
some studies suggest that the greatest benefit is improved quality of
life through short term control of disfiguring or painful tumors. The
most active chemotherapeutic agents used in single agent chemotherapy
include cisplatin, carboplatinin, paclitaxel, doetaxel, 5-flurouracil
and methotrexate.
Patients with advanced metastatic disease should be considered for reduction
of immunosuppression. Although there are no randomized controlled trials
studying reduction of immunosuppression as a therapeutic intervention,
some evidence suggests that his strategy may be beneficial as an adjunctive
treatment (reviewed in Otley Dermatologic Surgery, 31; 163 (2005). Changes
in immunosuppression regimens should always occur in close consultation
with the patient's transplant physicians and with a clear understanding
that the risk for organ rejection is elevated.
Recent data suggests that Rapamycin, an immunosuppressant with potent
anti-proliferative effects, may decrease the risk of developing skin cancer
(11). Although long term clinical trials have yet to be completed, transplant
patients who develop > 5 skin cancers per year or those who have developed
metastatic SCC might merit consideration for Rapamycin in place of other
immunosuppressants agents known to elevate skin cancer risks.
The 3-year disease-free survival rate in adult transplant patients with
distant metastatic disease is 56%(3). The type of treatment significantly
impacts disease survival. Those individuals treated with surgery alone
had a 1-year disease-free survival rate of 87% versus 67% in patients
who where treated with non-surgical means. Patients who had no treatment
had a 30% 1-year disease-free survival rate.
Of those patients who receive treatment for metastatic SCC, 29% relapse
within 1-year. The mean time from first metastasis to first relapse is
0.7 ± 0.5 year. Once relapse occurs, the disease-specific survival
after 1-year is 44%.
Patients with in-transit or regional metastasis as their first site of
metastases have better survival rates that those patients whose initial
diagnosis included a distant nodal or systemic site. This highlights the
benefits of serial clinical exams that closely follow draining nodal basins
to detect metastases at an early stage.

References:
1. J. A. Carucci et al., Dermatologic Surgery 30, 651 (2004).
2. I. Penn, J Pediatr Surg 29, 221 (Feb, 1994).
3. J.-C. Martinez et al., Arch Dermatol 139, 301 (March 1, 2003, 2003).
4. P. Jensen et al., J Am Acad Dermatol 40, 177 (Feb, 1999).
5. P. O'Donovan et al., Science 309, 1871 (Sep 16, 2005).
6. J. D. Wagner et al., Arch Dermatol 140, 75 (Jan, 2004).
7. T. Stasko et al., Dermatol Surg 30, 642 (Apr, 2004).
8. M. T. Ballo, K. K. Ang, Oncology (Williston Park) 18, 99 (Jan, 2004).
9. J. C. Martinez, C. C. Otley, S. H. Okuno, R. L. Foote, J. L. Kasperbauer,
Dermatol Surg 30, 679 (Apr, 2004).
10. C. C. Otley, S. L. Maragh, Dermatol Surg 31, 163 (Feb, 2005).
11. S. Euvrard, C. Ulrich, N. Lefrancois, Dermatol Surg 30, 628 (Apr,
2004).
12. C. Traywick, F. M. Reilly, Dermatologic Therapy 18, 12 (2005).
13. I. M. Neuhaus, W. D. Tope, Dermatol Ther 18, 28 (Jan-Feb, 2005).
14. G. Stallone et al., N Engl J Med 352, 1317 (Mar 31, 2005).
|